Forum

> > Off Topic > Which console is better?
Forums overviewOff Topic overviewLog in to reply

English Which console is better?

157 replies
Page
To the start Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next To the start

Poll Poll

Which console is better?

Only registered users are allowed to vote
Xbox360
29.27% (24)
Xbox
1.22% (1)
PlayStation3
32.93% (27)
Playstation2
8.54% (7)
Wii
1.22% (1)
PSP
3.66% (3)
Nintendo 3DS
0.00% (0)
Nintendo DS
1.22% (1)
Nintendo
3.66% (3)
I preffer read books...
18.29% (15)
82 votes cast

old Re: Which console is better?

Mechanolith
User Off Offline

Quote
I think it's you who can't read, ass.
It's about which console is better, not: AAH I NO LIKE XBOX BCUZ XBOX IZ GAY, nor I DON LIKE PS3 BECAUSE IZ FOR KIDZ.

Explain like real people, not animals.

old Re: Which console is better?

Alistaire
User Off Offline

Quote
As if animals have computers. As if animals care about Xboxes.

----

DESCRIPTION has written
I just wanted to see what other ppl think about this


Well I think Xboxes are much better than Ps3 because (insert reason) and Ps3 is (insert insult).

That's what I think about it. Still 100% ontopic.

old Re: Which console is better?

J4x
User Off Offline

Quote
Xbox sucks... I mean paying for playing online? waht the fuck is that? The controllers are so fuking huge! and the graphics are muck better in ps3. So ps3 all the way.

old Re: Which console is better?

Mechanolith
User Off Offline

Quote
user J4x has written
Xbox sucks... I mean paying for playing online? waht the fuck is that? The controllers are so fuking huge! and the graphics are muck better in ps3. So ps3 all the way.

Blur effect, graphics aren't better, the look is. But the pay to play online thing is good, keep a few kids away from the Xbox live (and it still have much).
Btw any 2006+ PC game has this option in video settings.
Argument invalid.

old Re: Which console is better?

Alistaire
User Off Offline

Quote
Lol Ps3 controllers are just fucking small. It fits in 1 hand.

The pay for online thing:

- Buy an Xbox
- Create an account
- Get free 1 month online!
- After 1 month, delete the account and make another
- This can be done +/- 10 times on each xbox
- Profit!

----

Ps3 uses blur effects in most games, and it's a newer console than the Xbox anyway. Thing is, you need to buy stuff for your Ps3 (Memorycards) for savegames. Now my Xbox 360 elite black awesome edition (299 euros bitch D:<) has 250 gb harddrive space.
Powned.

old Re: Which console is better?

WinterPwnd
User Off Offline

Quote
user Alistaire has written
Ps3 uses blur effects in most games, and it's a newer console than the Xbox anyway. Thing is, you need to buy stuff for your Ps3 (Memorycards) for savegames. Now my Xbox 360 elite black awesome edition (299 euros bitch D:<) has 250 gb harddrive space.
Powned.



I bought it for 169 euro when it was on a promotion from gamestop in spain

X360 controler is way better bcuz the stick layout is more comftorable, ps3 controler? Suxs its small...
And Cuchulainn, said it all. NO rly

old Re: Which console is better?

palomino
User Off Offline

Quote
user J4x has written
Xbox sucks... I mean paying for playing online? waht the fuck is that? The controllers are so fuking huge! and the graphics are muck better in ps3. So ps3 all the way.

PS3 has blur effect.
You don't pay for PS3's online and it gets hacked.
Have you ever played with an xbox controller? No? Then shut up.

old Re: Which console is better?

Mechanolith
User Off Offline

Quote
Probably all of you have noticed how i don't like old schooling. But one old thing i like is Call of Duty series, Medal of Honor, all these PS2 games we're awesome and brought me more fun then any shooter now-a-days.

Those new Call of Duty series are shit, the only decent Modern Warfare was the first one were you could enjoy the story with a nice but still few amount of missions. And now CoD has turned into a stupid multiplayer game with no strategy, just run n' shoot, and the developers think they're right for selling this shit for 60 dollars.
I miss the 20 missions with like 2 hours of gameplay each, no life-regeneration mutant skill, few med-kits in each level and the tireless search for them, the difficulty of the levels...

Those things can be really missed now, in my opinion the only good games from this time that made me feel a bit of fun i felt at the PS2 time were: Mirror's Edge, Skyrim, Modern Warfare 1 (just a li'l bit), Jame's Cameron's Avatar, Portal... these are examples of games that people had effort while working on.

I rather read a book/play my old loved PS2 than buy a stupid console that will make me lose money, be limited to X games and will not have network (no, im not setting up a router in my modem, this shit makes server hosting impossible, and im neither paying R$10 for having a network while i already have on my PC).

These above are facts, deal with them.

old Re: Which console is better?

WinterPwnd
User Off Offline

Quote
user Mechanolith has written
Those new Call of Duty series are shit, the only decent Modern Warfare was the first one were you could enjoy the story with a nice but still few amount of missions. And now CoD has turned into a stupid multiplayer game with no strategy, just run n' shoot, and the developers think they're right for selling this shit for 60 dollars.
I miss the 20 missions with like 2 hours of gameplay each, no life-regeneration mutant skill, few med-kits in each level and the tireless search for them, the difficulty of the levels...


Actualy CoDMW2 was allso good, but there were still litle amount of missions REal shet got real after CoDBO came out i mean character customisation WTF
And now MW3 triple atachments all multiplayer maps look the same campaign is shorter and it isnt interesting...

So Cod 1-4 and 6 were good CoD WaW failed with the zombies, u want zombies go play Left 4 Dead srsly.

To the topic im happy of my x360 i bought it cheap so i dont care alot i allso have a ps1 in my basement and a ps2 that my dad plays on it with me sometimes.

old Re: Which console is better?

Mechanolith
User Off Offline

Quote
user WinterPwnd has written
Actualy CoDMW2 was allso good

Nope, no difference between the first and the second one, they're using same models, all the same shit.

user WinterPwnd has written
So Cod 1-4 and 6 were good CoD WaW failed with the zombies, u want zombies go play Left 4 Dead srsly.

CoD6 was the same shit, 2 months of work and 6 of pure bullshit. WaW was fine since they tried to bring back the real Call of Duty purpose of World War 1 and 2, not fictional stupid and dramatic 3rd, 4th and etc ones. Zombies fit anywhere, they're awesome, and it's optional, no problem if a game has zombie mode, play it if you want.

old Re: Which console is better?

WinterPwnd
User Off Offline

Quote
user Mechanolith has written
user WinterPwnd has written
Actualy CoDMW2 was allso good

Nope, no difference between the first and the second one, they're using same models, all the same shit.

user WinterPwnd has written
So Cod 1-4 and 6 were good CoD WaW failed with the zombies, u want zombies go play Left 4 Dead srsly.

CoD6 was the same shit, 2 months of work and 6 of pure bullshit. WaW was fine since they tried to bring back the real Call of Duty purpose of World War 1 and 2, not fictional stupid and dramatic 3rd, 4th and etc ones. Zombies fit anywhere, they're awesome, and it's optional, no problem if a game has zombie mode, play it if you want.


Everybody has his taste • • • • •

old Re: Which console is better?

Mechanolith
User Off Offline

Quote
user palomino has written
user Mechanolith has written
no, im not setting up a router in my modem, this shit makes server hosting impossible

Server hosting? From home? From Brazil? HA HA HA OH WOW

Hahaha, that's true.
But yeah, my network connection is fairly good, it's able to host a Minecraft server for 3 friends without lag and that's enough for me.
And i don't host publics servers, just for friends.
To the start Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next To the start
Log in to replyOff Topic overviewForums overview